“Our task must be to free ourselves... by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature and its beauty." 

- Albert Einstein


We're a not-for-profit initiative advocating for topics that matter whilst innovating wider socio-ethical impact, planetary change and acknowledgement. 


We raise awareness for topics such as; sustainability, science, sentience, nature, environment, health, nutrition, mental health, mindfulness and more.


In recent times, we have faced challenges unlike any in recorded human history, and as a collective are now faced with humanity's cumulative mistakes inherited from many generations.

The time for change is now. It is now time to acknowledge and adapt to a better, fairer and more sustainable way of living.

Founder | Ellis Jackson

Editor | Kate Byng-Hall

The Holocaust Of Non-Human Animals

Updated: Jul 31, 2019

A controversial comparison by Shaun Britton.

Photo by Matthias Zomeer

During the Second World War Edgar Kupfer-Koberwitz, a survivor of the Dachau concentration camp, wrote: “I refuse to eat animals because I cannot nourish myself by the sufferings and by the death of other creatures. I refuse to do so, because I suffered so painfully myself that I can feel the pains of others by recalling my own sufferings.”

Controversy surrounds the comparison made between the experience of an animal in a slaughterhouse or a laboratory and the horrific revelations of the holocaust. If such a comparison is possible, directly or indirectly, then it spells a deeply important message for humanity. The message is about the grim reality behind the practices we take for granted - and a secret at the heart of our darkest hour.

Auschwitz and Abattoirs: Comparisons of Cruelty

The Oxford Dictionary's first definition of holocaust is ‘destruction or slaughter on a mass scale.’ The word holocaust is Greek in origin (Holos meaning 'whole' or ‘completely’, and Kaustos meaning ‘burnt’.) Amongst other uses, the term has been used to describe large scale destruction by fire, and then most commonly linked with the shocking Nazi campaign in World War Two.

Proponents of the comparison cite the shocking treatment animals receive from humans in industry. That the animal industries carry out their business without animals consent, or recognition as individuals with a right to life, is sadly only the tip of the comparison’s iceberg.

The comparison between concentration camps and slaughterhouses depicts a macabre backdrop to our modern age, with abject cruelty claimed in both the method and the motive of animal industries.

The comparisons are often difficult to digest, as much of the practices in these industries are not directly publicised to consumers, and hence remain largely out of sight.

The UK charity VIVA reports that 25% of pigs are slaughtered using gas chambers or tanks filled with C02, and the rest, like other animals, largely with electrocution.

Pigs take 30 seconds to asphyxiate and will squeal, hyperventilate and try to escape. News of gassing still being used hit the media in August, with chilling footage to accompany it.

An undercover investigation by Animal Aid in 14 UK slaughterhouses found acts of abuse and lawbreaking in 13 of them, including those labelled high welfare and RSPCA assured. These acts included pigs burnt with cigarettes and animals beaten.

In just November 2018 in the UK alone, 952,000 pigs were killed for meat, in an age where using animals for food has been argued to be unethical, unnecessary and unsustainable.

The appalling images of mass graves, and bodies of victims being used as material resources at concentration camps, haunt our collective history and will never be forgotten. These acts, all sadly can be argued to have their counterparts in the animal experience. How do we compare and contrast the two? Put simply, we don't.

Two Branches Of The Same Tree

Seeking to Resolve The Controversy

Speciesism is at the heart of the controversy and, it is argued, the reason for our treatment of non- human animals in general. If both atrocities are judged solely by the internal suffering of the victims, the chasm between them begins to narrow.

One atrocity should not, and does not rob from the other. Rather than comparing the animal atrocity to the human, both can be recognised as holocausts in their own right, in their own time and in their own context.

They are both branches of the same tree, and both should move us to ensure that each catastrophe is placed firmly where it belongs - in the past; remembered, but not repeated.

In suffering, we are the same. Terror for an animal is no less or greater a terror than for a human.

The steadfast perception and belief of another being's right to life and inherent value, regardless of whether they have hands or hooves, is at the core of the capacity to dominate the innocent.

We learn the programming code of oppression the moment we are told to pet the dog and eat the cow. As Jewish writer Isaac Bashevis Singer wrote “As long as people will shed the blood of innocent creatures there can be no peace, no liberty, no harmony between people. Slaughter and justice cannot dwell together.” | Tru. 🌱

We are a conscious publication and platform providing social-ethical insight and knowledge about topics that matter | Ethical insight, one place.

We are funded by readers like you. To support our work and journalism, donate here


1.) Kupfer-Koberwitz, Edgar. Dachau Diaries 1942-45. Special collections research centre, University of Chicago Library

2.) Viva!. [Online]. [19 December 2018]. Available from: do/slaughter/slaughter-farmed-animals-uk

3.) Daily Mail. 2018. Mail Online. [Online]. [19 December 2018]. Available from:

4.) Animal Aid. 2018. Animal Aid. [Online]. [19 December 2018]. Available from:

5.) 18. United Kingdom Slaughter Statistics – November 2018. [Online]. [19 December 2018]. Available:

6.) Kemmerer, L (2012). Animals and World Religions. England: Oxford University Press.p186




Name: The Truprint Group  Account: 37701460   

Sort code: 30-90-89

or PayPal

Our mission is to help society stay informed and much more

All proceeds generated go towards not-for-profit projects and initiatives

Our volunteers care about supporting 

people and the planet

Stay informed by subscribing today.

By subscribing, you're agreeing to our privacy policy.

Based in

Powered by advocates

  • Spotify
  • Twitter
  • White Facebook Icon
  • White Instagram Icon
  • White LinkedIn Icon

The informative hub for socio-ethical impact and acknowledgement.

Photo by Marina Vitale

Read. Listen. Advocate.

The Truprint Group ©

27 Old Gloucester Street, London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3AX 

Created by Tru. ©

Terms of Use & Privacy Policy

Company Number: 11188091

Terms, Conditions and Policies.

  • White Spotify Icon
  • White Facebook Icon
  • White Instagram Icon
  • White LinkedIn Icon
  • White Pinterest Icon


We are a project and trademark of The Truprint Group a Community Interest Company | CIC.